Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeff katz


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. --Core desat 05:38, 25 October 2007 (UTC)

Jeff_katz

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Copied from source; wrong format, etc. JBFrenchhorn 06:49, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep but cleanup and source. The basic gist of it is true (see this) and notable. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  14:08, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - this information may be true. But, this is definitely a copyvio.  Unless someone is going to take on actually writing an article and not copying one, this article should be removed.  -- Blind  Eagle  talk ~ contribs  16:09, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, not properly sourced, and nevertheless the subject doesn't seem notable. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 17:19, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Weak keep I've added IMDB listing & correct reference to magazine cited, but still not 100% convinced of notability per RS. SkierRMH 02:18, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete due to a LACK OF NON-TRIVIAL third party sources about the subject.  Bur nt sau ce  16:52, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. per BlindEagle. TGreenburgPR 21:38, 24 October 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.