Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jefferson Debate


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. &mdash;Cryptic 04:23, 7 January 2007 (UTC)

Jefferson Debate

 * — (View AfD)

Apparently non-notable; just an editorial on IP. Twinxor t 04:17, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, fails WP:NEO. --Dhartung | Talk 05:35, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. MER-C 06:05, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - while there definitely was a Hamilton/Jefferson debate that involved intellectual property, this is definitely a neologism derived from it, and appears to have no serious popularity or standing. --Haemo 06:14, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
 * delete per above. —dima/s-ko/ 19:26, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete I like this neologism, and the fact that some people still value logic in discourse. However, this still lacks the sources establish the import of the phrase, as required by WP:NEO.-- danntm T C 02:49, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete This is a mere editorial. The argument presented hits important points and I have no doubt that it has been raised by a notable commentator on IP.  The appropriate place for it is in an article on IP, in the context of a description of that commentator's views. Drake Dun 20:21, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.