Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/JeffreyM Consulting


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. v/r - TP 03:12, 14 November 2013 (UTC)

JeffreyM Consulting

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Despite numerous Google news searches including words like "consulting company", "Jeffrey McCannon", "Inc. 500" and "Bellevue Washington", I haven't found anything good aside from some PR and primary links (not even anything third-party). Additional searches at Bellevue Reporter, Bellevue Gazette and Seattle Times provided nothing. Frankly, it seems the most attention and significance they have received was for the 2010 Inc. 500 listing which is good and what was better was that their three-year growth was 1230%. Unfortunately, it doesn't seem they have received much attention since then and therefore there isn't much for an article. I actually also noticed that a user (Michelleruane) has edited the article quite frequently including adding other recognitions the company has received here (I didn't find any of these on my previous searches). As I recall, bizjournals.com links aren't always considered the best coverage but it also seems they have received other Inc. rankings (though not as good as the first time albeit still good). There is some good recognition but I would say wait a little more time to see if things balance out again and if they get some better coverage. Absolutely no prejudice towards a future article when the time comes. SwisterTwister  talk  21:57, 5 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 10:12, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Washington-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 10:12, 6 November 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete - No coverage in reliable sources. Being included in a variety of lists of fastest growing companies is not sufficient grounds for inclusion. -- Whpq (talk) 17:20, 11 November 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete The two collections of news about them &  don't include any significant coverage of the subject. In fact most of them don't mention it at all. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 00:53, 12 November 2013 (UTC)
 * That's probably because this is an American company, not Indian, and I haven't found any obvious Indian affiliations anyway. SwisterTwister   talk  05:21, 12 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Those links are probably bot triggered in some fashion. Just look at the URL.  You can substitute any topic you want and the India Times site will generate a news collection page for it.  For example, I just made up http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/topic/Fru-Fru-Dogs and it has a collection. -- Whpq (talk) 10:52, 12 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Well, the one article does mention a "FRU" project though so it may have been somewhat relevant despite an error. I think that's a problem I would notice with Times of India sometimes, there would be some inconsistencies. SwisterTwister   talk  20:43, 12 November 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.