Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeffrey A. Krames


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep /nomination withdrawn. Consensus is clear. Star  Mississippi  17:54, 9 October 2022 (UTC)

Jeffrey A. Krames

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Bringing this here for discussion. While one of his books has a Kirkus review, it appears his titles were published by the publishing company for which he works, rendering neutrality a question. They're not self published, but nor are they independent. I am unable to find other evidence of notability as a businessman or author, many speaker profiles, but they're not independent. Star  Mississippi  21:38, 30 September 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 23:30, 7 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Authors.  Star   Mississippi  21:38, 30 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:20, 1 October 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Keep. Passes WP:NAUTHOR. I found several more book reviews (and in multiple languages) in my university library. See below.4meter4 (talk) 01:37, 8 October 2022 (UTC)


 * (review of The Rumsfeld Way)
 * (review of Lead with Humility: 12 Leadership Lessons from Pope Francis)


 * Keep More sources 1, 2, are available online. Meets the WP:GNG criteria. I can also improve the article and add citations once I get some extra time. Fifthapril (talk) 04:06, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
 * I'll look to incorporate these into the article. --User:Ceyockey ( talk to me ) 14:20, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep and Comment&mdash;I've started doing some improvement on the article, starting with trimming down the opening para and adding a source. I do think that the article can be kept, but it needs work. --User:Ceyockey ( talk to me ) 14:17, 8 October 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.