Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeffrey Babcock


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Mailer Diablo 10:50, 24 July 2006 (UTC)

Jeffrey Babcock
Obvious vanity, but contains a shade of an assertion of notability; User:Jeffrey Babcock created it and has been inserting himself into various TV stations' "former personalities" sections. It's not exactly an uncommon name, but googling "jeffrey babcock" WABC gets all of 9 hits. Opabinia regalis 03:42, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom, non-notable... Michael 03:51, 19 July 2006 (UTC)

The author's insertions into various TV stations, as noted, reflect his previous television work. Nothing more or less. Failure to list biography of Jeffrey Babcock just leaves this station information without a biographical link. --Jeffrey Babcock 03:56, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Disclosure. The above editor is both subject and original editor of the article. —C.Fred (talk) 04:05, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment don't talk about yourself in the third person, it makes people cranky. Mak (talk)  00:57, 20 July 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. Totally non-notable and vanity. ---Charles 03:57, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete as non-verifiable, non-notible vanity. -- ShinmaWa(talk) 04:01, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom and as unverified, since this article cites no sources. —C.Fred (talk) 04:03, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, non-notable media personality per WP:BIO. -- Kinu t /c  04:24, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as per WP:BIO, WP:V, and WP:VAIN. Subject is not sufficiently notable under WP:BIO and no verifiable sources are cited. Smells strongly of vanity. Scorpiondollprincess 13:51, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete vanity article. JChap (talk • contribs) 23:23, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete: No significant and reliable sources. Please don't write articles about yourself. --Hetar 05:09, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Please see related AFD: Articles for deletion/Angela Russell JianLi 04:31, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment. The AfD on Angela Russell was restarted due to the addition of more articles to the deletion proposal; now see Articles for deletion/Angela Russell (second nomination). —C.Fred (talk) 16:19, 23 July 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.