Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeffrey Feinman


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete Nacon kantari  02:45, 5 October 2006 (UTC)

Jeffrey Feinman
Allegedly notable 'marketing pioneer' with <500 GHits. Artw 20:43, 23 September 2006 (UTC)


 * Keep asserts notability in the direct marketing field. JASpencer 21:14, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Does not provide any evidence of notability in the direct marketing field. Google finds about 200 unique hits for people of this name, and this one doesn't seem prominent even among Jeffrey Feinmans. (A veterinarian by that name seems to get more hits.) Fan-1967 22:00, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep for the time being, subjec to to verification. The absence of many Ghits for a person whose prime was before the internet era is not proof of his non-notability. There are sufficient achievements for there to be existence of some proof of these claims. Being author of a half a million seller alone, if substantiated, would make him pass WP:BIO. Ohconfucius 13:50, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
 * That claim, also, is unverified (and without even the title of the book supplied, rather difficult to try to verify). Seems to me "Keep because someone might verify it" goes against the usual standards. Fan-1967 17:02, 24 September 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete, as I'm currently unable to find any sources verifying these claims. If anybody knows of any, point them out, pronto. Luna Santin 21:54, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - as failing WP:V. My rule of thumb is that if an AfD doesn't find sources there aint no sources to find! BlueValour 03:44, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.