Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeffrey Gitomer


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was keep. Mailer Diablo 09:21, 25 July 2006 (UTC)

Jeffrey Gitomer
delete as per notability, poss. vanity page Chris 00:55, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete fail WP:BIO. SynergeticMaggot 02:31, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per SynergeticMaggot --Brad101 03:25, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep Article does state it's importance. I have seen many articles less "notable" kept —— Eagle (ask me for help) 05:36, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep Needs a de-POV/advert cleanup, but Gitomer appears to be notable. "Jeffrey Gitomer" gets 400K+ Google hits and this book ranks #196 on Amazon (1 of 15 there). -- Scientizzle 07:18, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Clear keep. The Little Red Book of Selling is in Amazon.com's top 200 sellers. His ezine alone has 80,000 subscribers, and he has a syndicted column in print. A Google search for his name in quotes returns over 400,000 hits, the first 40 of which (at least -- I didn't look any farther) are all relevant to him. This person is clearly notable. - CheNuevara 09:42, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Reluctant Keep the guy is as annoying as hell but unfortunately he is notable. He is almost a fixture at any sales convention/seminar (especially in the insurance sector).205.157.110.11 11:32, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep if the article is cleaned-up and verifiable sources are cited to back his notability has top 200 seller and syndicated columnist (as per CheNuevara). Scorpiondollprincess 14:30, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep Seems ok as a profile of an author — Preceding unsigned comment added by GuBu (talk • contribs)
 * Weak Keep as per but needs citations.-(chubbstar) — talk
 * Keep per notability established by CheNuevara. Themindset 18:05, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep per CheNuevara. Gitomer's syndicated column appears in numerous business publications (as noted in the article). A cleanup or similar tag is well in order, but a deletion is not. Agent 86 21:05, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep per CheNuevara and Agent 86. --Dhartung | Talk 06:49, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep, although if sources can't be provided, some text needs to be removed. -- Aguerriero  ( talk ) 15:40, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep per CheNuevara, and clean up as needed. Yamaguchi先生 22:21, 21 July 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.