Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeffrey Grossman


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Consensus is that NACADEMIC is met. (non-admin closure) power~enwiki ( π, ν ) 19:02, 16 July 2018 (UTC)

Jeffrey Grossman

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The subject is not notable; all sources are from the subject's own institution (MIT), and are not independent. No additional, independent sources were found on google, google books, and google news searches. Edit-llama (talk) 13:52, 8 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Hhkohh (talk) 14:25, 8 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Hhkohh (talk) 14:25, 8 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Massachusetts-related deletion discussions. North America1000 14:29, 8 July 2018 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep the holder of a named chair.John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:48, 8 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete. Lack of significant coverage from independent sources. The named chair itself isn't notable enough to be mentioned in the Massachusetts Institute of Technology article, so the person wouldn't be notable just by holding that chair. Newslinger (talk) 05:29, 12 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep. Reviewed WP:NACADEMIC regarding the named chair. Article needs significant expansion. Newslinger (talk) 14:05, 15 July 2018 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 06:40, 15 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep per WP:NACADEMIC #1 and #5 ( at MIT).  The criterion #1 can be satisfy by his citation count (e.g.  cited by 821  cite by 950) according to Google Scholar  (over 14,000 in total). He is also covered in other articles - e.g Scientific AmericanPopular SciencePhysics.org, therefore he also satisfies WP:GNG. Hzh (talk) 13:59, 15 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. XOR&#39;easter (talk) 16:04, 15 July 2018 (UTC)


 * Speedy keep. In addition to having such a clear pass of WP:PROF as to call into question the competence of the nominator, there is plenty of popular press for his work, some of which I have added to the article. —David Eppstein (talk) 19:14, 15 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep, named chair at MIT, that is already enough to pass WP:PROF. Nsk92 (talk) 13:53, 16 July 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.