Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeffrey J. Reuer


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. North America1000 02:51, 3 June 2020 (UTC)

Jeffrey J. Reuer

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not notable as a perfessor, reads like a resume. No sources that are independent of the topic. Ibn Daud (talk) 17:16, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2020 May 26.  —cyberbot I   Talk to my owner :Online 17:42, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep per #5 of WP:NACADEMIC. He is the Guggenheim Endowed Chair at CU-Boulder's Leeds School of Business. You are right though that the article reads like a resume, but AfD isn't for cleanup.  Bait30   Talk 2 me pls? 19:04, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. North America1000 15:01, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Colorado-related deletion discussions. North America1000 15:02, 27 May 2020 (UTC)


 * Keep, possibly snow. He appears to pass WP:NPROF C5 several times over, and his citation record looks like an easy pass of WP:NPROF C1. Russ Woodroofe (talk) 15:40, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep per WP:PROF and #C5. Possibly also #C3 if Fellow of the Strategic Management Society is sufficiently selective. —David Eppstein (talk) 18:57, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep: in addition to WP:PROF, also most likely meets WP:AUTHOR, with multiple books published by academic and university presses: Worldcat Identities. --K.e.coffman (talk) 04:17, 28 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep. Passes WP:Prof.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 05:40, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep. A combination of his endowed chair and his highly cited research satisfy WP:Prof. The article could do with some improvement though Pi (Talk to me!)  05:01, 1 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep The number of citations indicates that he clearly meets WP:NPROF. He also appears to meet criteria #5 of the same guidelines. Papaursa (talk) 00:12, 2 June 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.