Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeffrey N. Price


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was draftified by author. Now at Draft:Jeffrey N. Price. Procedural close. (non-admin closure) ansh 666 18:24, 29 August 2016 (UTC)

Jeffrey N. Price

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I see no notability here. References are all sideways, so to speak--he's mentioned here and there, but it's all on blogs, and there is no depth to them. So his camera and stuff are listed on a website. He took commercial photos for whiskey and for a truck--but what we are given is not proof that he's "known" for that, but rather links to the websites that use those photos but don't mention his name. Besides, we need secondary sourcing. No, I don't see notability here. Drmies (talk) 14:47, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete As Dermis said. I tried to eradicate the poor sourcing already, but that would have left absolutely nothing- or his name at the minimum. The sources are:
 * Wildscotsman- A blog, edited by the public;
 * Landrover- No confirmation of his work on the site;
 * Marvel- Another blog, which even the article acknowledges is only a mention;
 * Marvel: 'Take My Trade'- No mention of 'his part' that he supposedly played at all;
 * Comoicvine- Price's own blog? In any case, WP:PRIMARY.
 * Next two sourcess as above;
 * Japan Camera Hunter- possibly the closest we get to a third-party source; appears to be a fansite (albeit a serious one), but still ultimately WP:PRIMARY;
 * Emulsive.org- A zine of sourcs which merely links to Price's Twitter feed;
 * Schneider- Passing references to Jeff Price: his commentary rather than about him.
 * Fails WP:CREATIVE, specifically 'The person's work (or works) either (a) has become a significant monument, (b) has been a substantial part of a significant exhibition, (c) has won significant critical attention, or (d) is represented within the permanent collections of several notable galleries or museums.'; fails WP:BASIC as not having been 'eceived significant coverage in multiple published secondary sources that are reliable, intellectually independent of each other, and independent of the subject; and ultimately failing WP:GNG on account of that. Muffled Pocketed  15:18, 29 August 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. Nothing to rising to the level of notability. No significant attention, nor RS citing. Kierzek (talk) 15:32, 29 August 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.