Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeffrey Niehaus


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Reaper Eternal (talk) 17:49, 29 August 2011 (UTC)

Jeffrey Niehaus

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Article was deproded by an anon IP without addressing the underlying concern. Still appears to fail WP:ACADEMIC. I have been unable to find reliable sources to satisfy the notability requirements for an academic. The google scholar search turns up some citations, but not significant enough number to quality for WP:ACADEMIC. ConcernedVancouverite (talk) 17:44, 22 August 2011 (UTC)


 * delete the two sources cited are (a) his faculty page at school and (b) a blog.  his books are not published with academic houses, except (marginally) zondervan, and his hits on google scholar show few citations (i included link to search because he doesn't seem to publish under name jeffrey, so autogenerated link isn't helpful).  22 is the top, and that's for the zondervan book, and even that's not that many.  clearly, clearly fails wp:academic. &mdash; Alf.laylah.wa.laylah (talk) 18:25, 22 August 2011 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.  — frankie (talk) 16:33, 23 August 2011 (UTC)


 * Weak delete. GS cites above are 22, 6, 5, 2, 2, 1. Seems to be not really enough for WP:Prof, even in a very low cited field. Is there anything else? Xxanthippe (talk) 22:37, 23 August 2011 (UTC).
 * Delete. Fails WP:PROF, and also WP:GNG. Other articles of GCTS faculty have been created recently, but they are Presidents and occupiers of named chairs. Niehaus is neither. StAnselm (talk) 01:03, 24 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions.  —StAnselm (talk) 01:04, 24 August 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete - I am just not seeing anything significant enough in the record to indicate passing WP:PROF. Nsk92 (talk) 02:27, 25 August 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.