Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeffrey Scott Edell (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus.  Sandstein  18:02, 23 June 2020 (UTC)

Jeffrey Scott Edell
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:BIO and WP:SIGCOV. Lots of names and passing mentions in relation to companies, but very little specific to the person. Fails WP:THREE. No secondary sources.  scope_creep Talk  21:53, 2 June 2020 (UTC)

I have added four more reliable sources (Hollywood Reporter, IndieWire, Deadline and Venture Count Star) - this should meet the requirements for WP:THREE --DaJerm (talk) 03:22, 5 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 05:19, 5 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 05:19, 5 June 2020 (UTC)


 * Comment They seem to be appointments notices are very low quality references, not the WP:SECONDARY sources that are needed notability. I don't see any grouping of references that prove WP:BIO merely a bunch of paid advertising, mentions in relation to company and promotion/branding.  scope_creep Talk  14:36, 8 June 2020 (UTC)
 * You have 5 reference that are all same notice. There is a single decent source amongst the lot of them.  scope_creep Talk  14:38, 8 June 2020 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:53, 9 June 2020 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:23, 16 June 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.