Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeffreys Henry


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 06:26, 28 May 2011 (UTC)

Jeffreys Henry

 * – ( View AfD View log )

I fail to see how this company meets WP:CORP. Most search hits were sites affiliated with the subject, directory listings, PR pieces, or only mentioned this company in passing. The "top 100 firm" claim, though unreferenced in the article, is what got this past A7 in my book. However, in researching this claim and other claims of high rankings the company makes (on its website), these rankings were made by publications (Accountancy Age and Hemscott) that I would consider to be "media of limited interest and circulation" under WP:CORPDEPTH. If I'm wrong on the last claim please let me know. &mdash; KuyaBriBri Talk 19:29, 19 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 23:38, 20 May 2011 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:01, 26 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
 * Delete per nom. Doesn't pass WP:COMPANY. Crisco 1492 (talk) 11:03, 26 May 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.