Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jelena Tinska


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. going no consensus to allow some space for improvement and tranbslation of sources Spartaz Humbug! 06:09, 8 July 2010 (UTC)

Jelena Tinska

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Unsourced BLP, no indication of notability per WP:BIO according to the article and an (English) Google search.  Sandstein  20:16, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Serbia-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:07, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:07, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:08, 17 June 2010 (UTC)



 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:15, 23 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment Assistance of translating Serbian language sources is needed else WP:UNKNOWNHERE may be this article's downfall.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 01:54, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:15, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep. Certainly has a fair few sources, even if we can't translate them accurately. She's also well known in Serbia, it seems, and the article, while unsourced, isn't libellous or poorly written. Default to keep. Chase me ladies, I&#39;m the Cavalry (talk) 10:07, 23 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep at least until we can get a better translation, etc. as there do appear to be reliable sources, and it doesn't make much sense to delete prematurely, if the shortcoming is our lack of knowledge at the moment and it is reasonably correctible Vartanza (talk) 18:20, 27 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete an unsourced BLP, no evidence the person meets the notability guidelines. Lustralaustral (talk) 01:01, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Perhaps you might reconsider if the many Serbian sources found in Find sources receive translation.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 23:35, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Second relist rationale. The article is a BLP. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:16, 30 June 2010 (UTC)


 * Keep per my comments above. Article is now undergoing cleanup. Expansion and sourcing have commenced. Additional help would be appreciated.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 20:32, 2 July 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.