Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jelly Marketing


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. postdlf (talk) 18:37, 1 August 2014 (UTC)

Jelly Marketing

 * – ( View AfD View log )

The notability of this article is being contested, posting here to determine if this article should be kept or deleted. NintendoFan (Talk, Contribs) 06:47, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete - The company is about one year old and employs around 15 people. It's a small business. The article is referenced to the company's own web site, some local newspaper articles, press releases and other inferior sources. That they won a local business award is not significant enough to merit an encyclopedia article. Fails WP:ORGDEPTH and WP:ORGIND.- MrX 13:09, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of British Columbia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:11, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:12, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:12, 17 July 2014 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, j⚛e deckertalk 02:22, 25 July 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete: The local coverage confirms existence, but no evidence of encyclopaedic notability. AllyD (talk) 06:20, 25 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete. Nothing found to indicate that an encyclopedia article is justified. --Michig (talk) 07:29, 1 August 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.