Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jemima Repo


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Drmies (talk) 01:33, 20 November 2012 (UTC)

Jemima Repo

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Does not meet WP:BIO. Some 470 doctorates are completed annually and nearly 10,000 scientific articles or monographs are published yearly by the university’s researchers (http://www.helsinki.fi/admissions/postgraduate_applicants.htm). The person in question is according to the sources (http://www.helsinki.fi/politics/administration/researchers.html) just one of many hundred researchers in this one Finnish univeristy, namely Helsinki university. Every resercher with a doctorate has an basic obligation to publish some articles in there own particular field. I so no reason for this article. Pgarret (talk) 08:44, 24 October 2012 (UTC)

Social science


 * Delete appears to be about a PhD student, or least she was when the article was created. The thesis is listed on Google scholar, so is presumably complete. Though she may now be more notable, there has been no new content. There is also a possible COI. p.s. I relisted this with the original comment by nominator, who appears not to have followed the procedure, so this has been languishing for approaching a month. Paul B (talk) 16:46, 13 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:52, 13 November 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete. Someone at this level (now a postdoctoral researcher? at least that's what the Helsinki profile says) needs to make a very big splash to pass WP:PROF, because it's an early point in the academic career and without a longer record it's difficult to distinguish the student from the advisor. But I'm not seeing any evidence of it in this case. —David Eppstein (talk) 06:06, 15 November 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.