Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jemma Baines


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Significant coverage in multiple RS has been shown. (non-admin closure) Kraxler (talk) 15:15, 2 June 2015 (UTC)

Jemma Baines

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

promotional article without reliable 3rd party source. The designation as "australia's top model"by a website in not a RS, and the rest is home-town coverage only (tho admittedly Adelaide is a big city)  DGG ( talk ) 07:36, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete Yes this source not appropriate Wikipedia is not a place for peoples CVs.  Doc James  (talk · contribs · email) 07:58, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep, but remove potential unreliable sources. There are separate articles in Australian Vogue, The Daily Telegraph, Sydney Morning Herald, Le Figaro Madame about her. Brandmeistertalk  14:12, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep per sources found - The article doesn't look that bad although admittingly the sources could be better but notability is there so will have to say Keep. – Davey 2010 Talk 14:50, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:14, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:15, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:15, 26 May 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.