Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jemma Churchill


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. North America1000 08:52, 9 November 2015 (UTC)

Jemma Churchill

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:NACTOR, non-notable JMHamo (talk) 10:11, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  Human 3015   TALK    10:14, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions.  Human 3015   TALK    10:15, 16 October 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom - Fails NACTOR & GNG. – Davey 2010 Talk 19:52, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep - clearly an actress with some credible roles. Users needs to stop messing non-notability up with a bad state of an article. --BabbaQ (talk) 17:35, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep Passes GNG. I am also surprised that this very new article was nominated so quickly after creation. Please try to give the creator (and others) time to clean up. Megalibrarygirl (talk) 20:40, 19 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Comment - Could you please explain how exactly it passes GNG? JMHamo (talk) 21:00, 22 October 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete as I see no convincingly better improvement. SwisterTwister   talk  05:45, 23 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - per nom, Davey2010 and SwisterTwister. No notable roles in tv, film or major stage productions. Searches fail WP:GNG.  Onel 5969  TT me 14:16, 23 October 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — ☮ JAaron95  Talk   16:27, 23 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. clpo13(talk) 23:27, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. clpo13(talk) 23:27, 24 October 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep per career meeting WP:ENT even if seen as weak on GNG. See WP:GNGACTOR. Am working on it and yes... there is more to do for this person who has had major roles in multiple well-received stage productions, and some major enough in her lengthy television career. Cheers.  Schmidt,  Michael Q. 11:45, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep - per MichaelQSchmidt.  Yash!  01:15, 30 October 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spartaz Humbug! 22:04, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep per career meeting WP:ENT. This is obviously a new article that is still in development. TeriEmbrey (talk) 19:34, 4 November 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.