Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jemseg River Bridge


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure)  TheSpecialUser TSU 01:55, 5 September 2012 (UTC)

Jemseg River Bridge

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Overall lack of notability, it's a bridge... on a river. dain  talk   15:36, 29 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep &mdash; Albeit weakly. A simple Google search shows several independent sources covering this topic, although I'm not sure of how reliable they are. Nevertheless, I'm not convinced that it fails WP:GNG. Kurtis (talk) 00:59, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 12:18, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 12:18, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 12:18, 30 August 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep -- we have lots of articles on bridges. At 950m long this is a relatively large one.  Peterkingiron (talk) 12:24, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
 * On the grounds of the bridge itself, Keep - While Kurtis' WP:GHITS search doesn't seem to turn up anything reliable enough to me, the fact that this is a major bridge on a major national highway suggests that it's reasonable to assume that sufficient offline sources are available, either official or in non-gNews Archive-compiled newspapers (during construction and such) to establish notability. On the grounds of the nomination, however, Speedy Keep, as the nominator does not establish a policy-based reason for deletion, rather stating its "just not notable". - The Bushranger One ping only 19:55, 3 September 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.