Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jen Consalvo


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. NPASR, but we're at no consensus and a month. Courcelles 00:50, 12 March 2013 (UTC)

Jen Consalvo

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable person. No reliable sources. Not the subject of multiple third party references, no assertion of notability. CitizenNeutral (talk) 02:16, 12 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep and improve - Nominator deleted content and did not bother to search for supporting references, which are easily found via Google: ie deleted American University alum fact American.edu Story with photo, Washington Post profile, LA Times Profile, WashingtonExec profile. There seems to be a pattern relating to her partner Frank Gruber, as well as Jon Pastor and tech entrepreneurs in general, as the nominator has used a similar approach with those articles and their companies Tech Cocktail and Rent Jungle among several others. See User_talk:CitizenNeutral-- Nixie9  ✉  14:48, 13 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:53, 17 February 2013 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Cheers, Ri l ey    00:16, 19 February 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete - To quote WP:Notability a person needs to be "significant, interesting, or unusual enough to deserve attention or to be recorded". Don't see that here. I would also dispute the nuetrality of some of the sources Gbawden (talk) 08:11, 19 February 2013 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mediran  ( t  •  c ) 10:52, 26 February 2013 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mediran  ( t  •  c ) 10:52, 5 March 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep - Seems to be a recognized expert in her field, per THIS notice of a speaking engagement at American University. Carrite (talk) 16:55, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Borderline: Weighing in because this has been open a long time, not sure we can avoid a no consensus close at this point.  But she's primarily just a competent professional, with good self-marketing skills.--Milowent • hasspoken  05:57, 6 March 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.