Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jen Dawson


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗ plicit  05:06, 16 October 2022 (UTC)

Jen Dawson

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

I admit my unfamiliarity with the sources that would be typical of an article on a fashion model so my ability to perform a WP:BEFORE search is somewhat limited, but so far as I can tell the sources present are no good (including the Daily Record article) for proving notability. In my search, I didn't see anything that looked like it would support this article, but again I could be mistaken in that regard. A redirect to Virgil_Howe seems most appropriate. QuietHere (talk) 06:32, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fashion and England. QuietHere (talk) 06:32, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 07:40, 2 October 2022 (UTC)


 * Delete Seems to be almost no references here at all.   scope_creep Talk  10:38, 3 October 2022 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 20:48, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: A new reference from Metro has been added by Milowent. Per WP:METRO, this source is considered generally unreliable. QuietHere (talk) 01:24, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
 * She wasn't actually naked?--Milowent • hasspoken 16:30, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
 * @Milowent I'm not sure I understand what you mean by this. The problem isn't with the facts, it's with the source not showing an increase in notability for the subject because it is considered unreliable. QuietHere (talk) 23:32, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
 * It was a joke. I think any news coverage can count towards notability, even if lesser sources may not count for much.  User:Bessiya who seems to have shepherded it over the past 13 years has not appeared, and this article just hasn't piqued my interest enough to try to rescue.--Milowent • hasspoken  13:06, 6 October 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * For what it's worth, I would also support a straight delete if @Scope creep doesn't think my proposed redirect target is appropriate for some reason. I figure redirecting there is the right move since they were married and had a kid together, but if there's disagreement on that then I'd like to hear it. QuietHere (talk) 00:41, 13 October 2022 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 23:11, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment Metro is non-RS. Ref 1,4 and 7 are non-rs. Metro can't count towards notability as its non-rs.   scope_creep Talk  07:53, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete nothing for her, I keep getting hits for Dawson's Creek, the tv show. She appears to have dropped off the radar. Oaktree b (talk) 03:51, 16 October 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.