Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jen richer


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Mgm|(talk) 22:42, 1 December 2008 (UTC)

Jen richer

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Jen Richer created this page to let the world know how great she is for doing her job. Phlegm Rooster (talk) 06:48, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
 * If that's the case, it's mildly disconcerting that she doens't know that her own surname should have a capital letter ;-) -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 10:13, 27 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete everything with prejudice. The author has a conflict of interest, and is unable to view the subject objectively and fairly. This irreparably taints the text. Any editor who uses this text as a starting point will not produce an objective, unbiased result. - Richard Cavell (talk) 10:37, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions.   -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:24, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of News-related deletion discussions.   -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:24, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom as non-notable autobiography. --Lockley (talk) 16:41, 29 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ➨ ❝ ЯEDVERS ❞ a sweet and tender hooligan 20:23, 1 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete - no reliable source to establish notability. Wiki is not a personal webpage or a place in which to dump one's resume.--Boffob (talk) 20:26, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete – First let me say nice job to Jenricher the original author of the piece.  We could use more editors with your talent and go on to say, I am sure one day Wikipedia will have an article about Ms. Richer.  However, sorry to say, today is not that day.  I was able to find just 1 article, as shown here .  We need a tad more to establish Notability.  Good luck to you. ShoesssS Talk 20:43, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Seems a bit of a vanity piece to me. Paste Talk 21:40, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Weak Delete, with no prejudice against re-creation at a later date.  As much as I prefer articles about real people over articles about fictional characters (esp. with the recentism that is so rampant here, we have god knows how many articles about The Simpsons and South Park but none for Algonquin J. Calhoun or the Video Ranger), Ms. Richer doesn't seem to have garnered enough coverage in secondary sources to pass muster with WP:N and WP:BIO. That said, her effort is most appreciated and I hope she continues to contribute. L0b0t (talk) 21:48, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per above with no prejudice against recreation provided notability is established later. However, it currently fails WP:BIO, WP:N and WP:Geogre's Law. I hope that Ms. Richer gets her article some day, written by someone else preferably. in the meantime, someone please direct her to MySpace. Trusilver  22:41, 1 December 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.