Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jencyclopaedia

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was Delete Zzyzx11 (Talk) 06:49, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Jencyclopaedia
I know some great Jens too - but I really can't see how this is notable --Doc (?) 00:28, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * I think the "random jenerator" qualifies it for BJAODN. Regretfully delete, fails my "anyone could do it" test. Kappa 00:38, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, Wikipedia is not advertising/self-promotion. --bainer (talk) 00:39, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment: The author did not add the page, I did. I mentioned this in the talk page. I won't vote because I did add the article, however I did think it was an interesting site worth a mention, as there are other "as interesting" sites on wiki.
 * <>Who 01:11, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC)


 * Delete. Wikipedia is not a web directory. A &#1080; D &#1103; 01D  TALK  EMAIL  01:28, Jun 3, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Interesting, but not really notable. Columbia 01:30, Jun 3, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. NeoJustin 01:55, June 3, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete' unless evidence is presented that it's a well-known site. But too bad it's not the Jengodcyclopedia. Then it would be worth an extreme keep. -- Decumanus 01:56, 2005 Jun 3 (UTC)
 * Shall we delete it even if it has a voluminous article on User:Jengod? ;) -- Jonel 03:39, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete as non-encyclopedic.   &mdash; J I P | Talk 10:10, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete - It is a website that is not well known (in the U.S. at least, don't know about England or the UK). I would vote against deletion, if this was a piece of published work instead of a website. Besides, nothing links here (what article would?) &mdash;Kjammer 10:35, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. not vanity, but not notable. Nateji77 12:53, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment: 310 google hits for Jencyclopaedia. Article is an orphan. -- Infrogmation 17:09, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * BJAODN 18:52, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC)216.186.53.4
 * Delete unless it can be shown that this article could be significantly expanded (in accordance with Importance). ··gracefool |&#9786; 00:46, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep Way more interesting than a lot of the non-notable high school articles flowing in here, and at least as relevant to the Jens of the world. Denni &#9775; 02:52, 2005 Jun 4 (UTC)
 * Delete Meaningless. --minghong 06:21, 10 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages.  Please do not edit this page .