Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jendrik Sigwart


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Germany in the Eurovision Song Contest 2021. Obviously this isn’t likely to stand long and the bar for undoing and working in the article is very low. Spartaz Humbug! 08:24, 24 February 2021 (UTC)

Jendrik Sigwart

 * – ( View AfD View log )

No single source cited. Reads like a line of advert. Fails WP:GNG  Jen yir e2  06:26, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions.  Jen yir e2  06:26, 15 February 2021 (UTC)


 * Speedy delete unsourced BLP, although someone previously removed two sources that refereed to a future event. Possibly (talk) 06:42, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:20, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:20, 15 February 2021 (UTC)


 * Keep, revert to this revision. Alternatively, redirect to Germany in the Eurovision Song Contest 2021 and revert to an article in approximately 10 days. (Eurovision contestants tend to generate massive coverage). —Kusma (t·c) 08:46, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep, per Kusma. — TheThomanski | t | c | 12:49, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Germany in the Eurovision Song Contest. He may get coverage after Eurovision but until n that happens, a standalone arriving isn't justified.  -- Whpq (talk) 13:06, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep - It has already been established several times that participating in ESC is notable within WP:NMUSIC #10 and #12. And also per WP:GNG.BabbaQ (talk) 14:34, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Draftify or redirect. Subject has not yet competed in Eurovision and is thus not yet notable under the guidelines. Grk1011 (talk) 21:51, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
 * No such precedent has ever been set. Every AfD on Eurovision performers has however set the precedent that being your countries representative at ESC is notable.BabbaQ (talk) 13:11, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
 * You cited WP:NMUSIC #10 and #12, however both are past tense: has been and has performed. Can you provide some AfD examples for future entrant articles that were kept to support your stated precedent? I've personally only seen AfDs after they've participated and for which you rightfully point out that many are kept. I'm uncomfortable with the idea of having an article for someone who may be notable in the future, but isn't yet. Grk1011 (talk) 23:17, 19 February 2021 (UTC)


 * Strong keep. He’s a Eurovision entrant. All Eurovision entrants deserve pages. EuroAgurbash (talk) 00:22, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Germany in the Eurovision Song Contest for now, per Grk1011. The subject may be notable per WP:NMUSIC once he performs on Eurovision. -- Ashley yoursmile!  16:13, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep He is Germany's entrant for Eurovision so *is* notable. I think the difficulty comes from him being pretty much a complete unknown prior to the Contest so there are very little sources available. But that is, in itself, notable, for someone to be plucked from obscurity into the Finals of one of the world's most popular music competitions. By the strict rules of Wikipedia notability guidelines, his article might need deleting. BUT there is context here which can't be ignored. doktorb wordsdeeds 06:49, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep. He's representing his country in Eurovision and is notable per WP:NMUSIC. Furthermore, there is a precedent for other artists who are representing their country in Eurovision getting a page of their own. ser! (chat to me). 12:36, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Redirect per BabbaQ and Ashley. There's no rush, when there are enough sources to write a full article, we can undo the redirect at that point, but not before. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont)  13:02, 23 February 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.