Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jenna Davis


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Draftify. Liz Read! Talk! 23:33, 4 January 2023 (UTC)

Jenna Davis

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Actress, dancer, singer-songwriter, and model (says the article) but not notable in all these categories. She's still very young (only 18) so she may very well turn out to be notable if her career takes off but she's not there yet. A Google search finds the obvious Facebook/Instagram/TikTok/IMDb\YouTube but no significant coverage in third-party reliable sources. Pichpich (talk) 23:58, 28 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Pichpich (talk) 23:58, 28 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women and Texas. Shellwood (talk) 00:43, 29 December 2022 (UTC)


 * Delete She barely gets a mention about being in the film in Looper, then it's all the usual social media sites. Even the sourcing used in the article is scant, one talking about the trailer then the other one telling us about what she's wearing. Oaktree b (talk) 02:35, 29 December 2022 (UTC)


 * Move to draft for now. The film has a lot of buzz right now, and is therefore likely to be a fairly sizable hit, which would inevitably lead to more coverage for its stars. BD2412  T 14:53, 29 December 2022 (UTC)


 * Keep with added sources. I found a bunch of sources that mention her    Most mentions seem credible and notable - I feel like this person should have wikipedia coverage HeliosSunGod (talk) 16:45, 29 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Those sources just namedrop the actress to say that sh vopice act for the movie M3GAN. That's not significant coverage. - RovingPersonalityConstruct (talk, contribs) 17:31, 29 December 2022 (UTC)


 * Draftify: The sources that have been provided are just about the one film that is about to be released.  I support adding it to a draft until more coverage is available.  Mike   Allen  17:17, 29 December 2022 (UTC)


 * Draftify The article was created prematurely, but it is likely that the subject will be notable in the near future. BruceThomson (talk) 09:07, 30 December 2022 (UTC)


 * Draftified should be, with the view to the future. LvivForev (talk) 17:27, 4 January 2023 (UTC)


 * Draftify While there may not be significant coverage about Davis now, there may be some in the future that would make them notable, so I support draftifying the article. --Harobouri • 🎢  • 🏗️ (he/him)  21:36, 4 January 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.