Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jenna Marbles


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:21, 26 May 2012 (UTC)

Jenna Marbles

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

non-notable Youtube artist who has not received any significant secondary coverage. All secondary sources in the article give trivial coverage, and no significant sources can be found. Coffeepusher (talk) 21:11, 19 May 2012 (UTC)


 * Weak Delete Google News shows that there is international coverage over a couple of years but it all seems to stem from a WP:1E single event, the Youtube video mentioned in the article in question and her comments about it, and the nominator is correct that coverage is shallow. Not notable at this time but substantial coverage for some additional reason could easily push her over the edge to fulfill notability standards. --❨Ṩtruthious ℬandersnatch❩ 00:22, 20 May 2012 (UTC)


 * Weak Delete — As per nom, but without prejuidice if she becomes notable. C(u)w(t)C(c) 02:09, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 03:14, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 03:14, 20 May 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep I see from a cursory Google News search a variety of coverage from both English and non-English sources, originating from 2010 (e.g., ) and earlier, and continuing through 2012. More recent articles include, , , , , , , and . That multiple videos she has made have garnered individual coverage, coupled with the fact that she is (from what I can tell) one of the top ten most subscribed YouTubers (and possibly the most subscribed female?) indicates that she is notable to me. / ƒETCH COMMS  /  01:25, 21 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep Retracting my previous "Weak Delete" !vote because the evidence ƒETCH  COMMS  presents includes articles that focus in-depth on Mourey herself instead of just mentioning her and the one original fame-inspiring video.  Hence, she satisfies WP:BASIC at least, if not WP:CREATIVE too. --❨Ṩtruthious ℬandersnatch❩ 02:18, 21 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep as per fetchcomms - also to mention that although secondary, the ABC news source is not a "trivial mention". Chaheel Riens (talk) 10:46, 21 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep Sufficient coverage provided for GNG (although is she really a Sports Counselor!?) --Colapeninsula (talk) 16:02, 23 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep - Most of youtube personality articles get A7ed but not in this case. There are notable results in google and also, the article passes WP:GNG  →TSU T* 17:43, 25 May 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.