Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jenni Muldaur


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 21:06, 25 February 2017 (UTC)

Jenni Muldaur

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The subject fails notability: none of the sources meet the criteria for a notable source. A google search turns up no dedicated article, etc from a reliable source in the first ten pages. She's listed largely because of her notable parents (Geoff and Maria), but in this encyclopedia notability is not inherited. Further, the article was created by an editor who has edited no other article,suggesting a very strong connection to the subject. I feel like a bit of an ogre for urging the deletion of an article about the attractive offspring of two quite notable artists, but that's just too bad--the article needs to go. Tapered (talk) 06:31, 16 February 2017 (UTC)


 * Keep A cursory Google News search based in the U.S. demonstrates WP:BASIC if not WP:GNG. Article could use expansion, not deletion per WP:ATD. Hmlarson (talk) 02:56, 18 February 2017 (UTC)
 * In July 1992, Billboard thought she was a newsmaker.1 Relying on Google alone for news articles from the early 90's seems a questionable — though quick and easy — approach for determining notability. Hmlarson (talk) 03:05, 18 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Check the example for triviality @ WP:GNG. The google news search lists a series of trivial mentions, nothing dedicated to Ms Muldaur—not even close. The Billboard entry is the embodiment of triviality: a caption/mention in a group picture. No article, no paragraph in an article. At the top of all AfD entries, there is a series of potential resources to find references. The subject was a FAIL for each of them. Tapered (talk) 05:13, 19 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 20:44, 20 February 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete Makes the usual flawed arguments of notability by association and/or existence. Yes, she's had a long, busy career. But none of the provided sources offer significant independent, third party verification of anything of encyclopedic importance. If references can be provided that prove otherwise I'll gladly change my vote. ShelbyMarion (talk) 16:03, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete While the list of records and tours looks impressive, she was a backing vocalist on those. Her own records do not appear to have charted or got major press coverage. Yes, there are some google news results, but I can't find any substantial coverage that is about her specifically. Fyddlestix (talk) 18:05, 24 February 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.