Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jennicet Gutiérrez


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. (non-admin closure) — Omni Flames  ( talk   contribs ) 03:51, 9 April 2016 (UTC)

Jennicet Gutiérrez

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

WP:BLP of an activist, with no strong claim of notability under our inclusion standards for activists: the reliable source coverage here is piled entirely onto a single incident which makes her a WP:BLP1E, while all of the other sourcing is of the primary variety and cannot boost notability. As always, Wikipedia is not a public relations platform to honor people just because we like or respect the work they do -- it's an encyclopedia, on which certain specific markers of notability, and a certain minimum level of RS coverage in media, have to be attained before a person becomes suitable for inclusion. Delete, without prejudice against recreation in the future if she can be sourced better than this. Bearcat (talk) 22:21, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions.  /wiae   /tlk  00:15, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions.  /wiae   /tlk  00:15, 6 March 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, clpo13(talk) 23:59, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:BLP1E. No significant coverage in independent reliable sources outside of the one event. —&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·C) 00:04, 13 March 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep. While she came to fame through her heckling of Obama, she has continued as a notable person since that time. E.g. https://thebottomline.as.ucsb.edu/2015/11/carrying-the-torch-for-her-sisters-jennicet-gutierrez-speaks-on-her-experiences-as-a-translatina  Keynote speaker at a major conference. http://www.dailycamera.com/cu-news/ci_29554696/cu-boulder-set-host-10th-annual-transforming-gender  http://dailynexus.com/2015-11-08/jennicet-gutierrez-advocates-for-marginalized-groups-at-the-hub/  The coverage just goes on and on. Ross-c (talk) 17:28, 13 March 2016 (UTC)
 * University student newspapers (which is what all three of those links are) cannot assist passage of WP:GNG at all — they're acceptable for some supplementary confirmation of facts after the article has already passed GNG, but they're not widely distributed and not archived in any place where we could feasibly still access the content for ongoing verification purposes if the website links ever die, so they cannot carry GNG in and of themselves. Newspaper coverage has to be to general market daily papers to count toward showing notability — a university student newspaper may only be used for additional confirmation of facts after GNG has already been satisfied, and cannot bring the passage of GNG. Bearcat (talk) 19:43, 17 March 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Malcolmxl5 (talk) 07:19, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:18, 28 March 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  MBisanz  talk 12:19, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete This person was named on some list of 100 people in 2015, a list that comes out every year and has 100 people on it. This is not enough to establish notability. Nothing else is either.John Pack Lambert (talk) 03:26, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep: If she were temporarily famous for some forgettable event, I'd delete. But she continues to get coverage and attention. Keep with a banner asking for more and newer references.VanEman (talk) 17:38, 3 April 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.