Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jennifer Diane Reitz (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. ☺ ·  Salvidrim!   ·  &#9993;  14:49, 5 February 2015 (UTC)

Jennifer Diane Reitz
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not notable. All sources are WP:PRIMARY or do not mention her. Her three webcomics are not notable, nor is the site. Last AFD was nine years ago and resulted in "no consensus". Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 18:56, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  B E C K Y S A Y L E S  09:58, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  B E C K Y S A Y L E S  09:58, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions.  B E C K Y S A Y L E S  09:59, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions.  B E C K Y S A Y L E S  09:59, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions.  B E C K Y S A Y L E S  09:59, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Oregon-related deletion discussions.  B E C K Y S A Y L E S  09:59, 16 January 2015 (UTC)


 * Comment: I've fixed a few of the cites and she is mentioned in some academic texts and other works. I'll see what else I can find, but offhand I think that she'll probably squeak by notability guidelines. Tokyogirl79  (｡◕‿◕｡)   10:31, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
 * I do think that it'd probably be best to merge Happy Puppy into her article, though. It's such a brief article that it could easily be merged and redirected to the appropriate section. I'd advise this as opposed to vice-versa since JDR has received notice in the earlier mentioned academic texts for her other actions/works, so it'd make sense for her to have an article that incorporates info about Happy Puppy as opposed to an article about the site that had information about her. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   10:36, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete, in spite of good efforts by . I looked at the main sources currently used in the article; while it appears Ms. Reitz is mentioned in several high quality independent sources, it is only in passing. I do not see high quality sources that treat her as the central focus, so (unless we have missed some significant works) she does not meet the general notability guideline. -Pete (talk) 19:57, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
 * What do you think about merging this together with Happy Puppy? I think that together they could make for a decent article that passes notability guidelines as a whole. She created the website with her two domestic partners but she's always been the face/name of the company as a whole for the most part. I think I'll try to do a test merge of information to see how this looks. I won't redirect the main article for Happy Puppy until there's a consensus though, as I don't want it to get deleted if this closes as delete for JDR. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   08:57, 17 January 2015 (UTC)
 * I'm not super gung-ho on keeping this, I mostly just want to make sure that this merge is taken into consideration so that if this is deleted and it gets contested, we can say that it was considered. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   09:38, 17 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Looks like Boppin' is up for deletion. That could probably be redirected to this article as well, I think. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   09:41, 17 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 16:08, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Webcomics-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:08, 22 January 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, N ORTH A MERICA 1000 00:13, 23 January 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
 * Keep. I'm not overwhelmingly happy with the sourcing on the page, but there's enough there to pass notability guidelines. I think that if we lump together the article for Boppin' and Happy Puppy together with JDR's article, there is enough to pass notability guidelines as a whole. I'd actually prefer for this all to be in an article under the group's name of Accursed Toys since Happy Puppy and Boppin' were technically released by the group, but the information about JDR wouldn't fit neatly in that article and part of the sources about her are needed to really help push notability. It's not the strongest keep and I do think that this should probably be revisited in the future if notability guidelines grow more strict (which is one of the few givens on Wikipedia), but for now she seems to pass notability guidelines. It's not the strongest keep but I think that if we get rid of the individual pages and make this the main article for everything, it'd pass notability guidelines. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   05:27, 24 January 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, N ORTH A MERICA 1000 02:55, 31 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep per Tokyogirl79.  CookieMonster755  (talk)   00:43, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.