Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jennifer Elder


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Nomination withdrawn. (non-admin closure) LibStar (talk) 03:37, 13 January 2023 (UTC)

Jennifer Elder

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Fails WP:AUTHOR. A search of her name mainly yields namesakes and nothing indepth. LibStar (talk) 01:19, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete WesSirius (talk) 01:44, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Comment - if she inspired a character in a play, that seems notable. The source doesn't seem to back it up thought. What do others think? CT55555 (talk) 02:05, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
 * I don't think inspiring a character necessarily indicates notability, but please take a look at the article again, me and DaffodilOcean added some more content. Mujinga (talk) 03:37, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Artists, Authors,  and Women. ––FormalDude  (talk)  02:43, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Comment - Jennifer Elder as cited by other editors seems to lack WP:SIGCOVPranesh Ravikumar (talk) 02:50, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep - "My Book of Autism Heroes" passes WP:AUTHOR still coverage of author is less but could expand the article.Pranesh Ravikumar (talk) 12:50, 12 January 2023 (UTC)


 * Keep - the various book reviews of her two books indicate that she passes NAUTHOR Mujinga (talk) 03:40, 12 January 2023 (UTC)


 * Keep There are a few book reviews in peer-reviewed journals for her book, seems like an AUTHOR pass to me. Oaktree b (talk) 04:07, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
 * My Book of Autism Heroes was the book. Oaktree b (talk) 04:07, 12 January 2023 (UTC)


 * Keep. Seems sufficiently notable. CT55555 (talk) 05:49, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 06:46, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep. Based on reviews of the subject's books, the article passes WP:AUTHOR. While there could be more coverage of the subject with an expansion of the article, it meets WP:GNG. -AuthorAuthor (talk) 02:21, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep - There are several reviews of her books, therefore this author passes WP:NAUTHOR, and the article should be retained. Netherzone (talk) 03:34, 13 January 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.