Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jennifer Guy


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 12:10, 25 January 2020 (UTC)

Jennifer Guy

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Essentially unsourced except to IMDb since its creation in 2010. Subject has had roles in a number of notable productions, but whether or not thses roles were "significant" (as required by WP:NACTOR) is debatable. A quick check prior to nomination suggests that there are insufficient sources to warrant to pass of WP:GNG, so bringing here for discussion. Yunshui 雲 水 00:18, 18 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Yunshui 雲 水  00:18, 18 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 05:55, 18 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 05:55, 18 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 05:55, 18 January 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete Looked for the sources, but failed to find significant coverage or at least mentions in reliable sources. I don't think that her roles are significant enough to secure her an article. Less Unless (talk) 12:59, 18 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete Wikipedia is not meant to be an IMDb mirror. The situation is made worse by their being no evidence her roles were significant.John Pack Lambert (talk) 23:33, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep: Starring roles in Cavegirl and Harry and Cosh may meet WP:NACTOR, although the shows might not be notable enough. Another problem: no sources in the article. Dflaw4 (talk) 05:57, 23 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Where are the sources? We can not keep BLPs without reliable sources, and IMDb is not reliable.John Pack Lambert (talk) 14:03, 23 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Hi, John, I agree that sources are needed—hence I have only voted it as a "weak" keep. If no progress is made in that regard, then I'd expect that the "delete" votes would prevail. Dflaw4 (talk) 14:20, 23 January 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.