Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jennifer Nadel


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. Nakon 01:02, 1 March 2015 (UTC)

Jennifer Nadel

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Does not appear notable, though perhaps she may be after her book is published.  DGG ( talk ) 17:54, 21 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:59, 23 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:59, 23 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:00, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
 * Delete Neither her writings nor political role rise to the level of notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 06:06, 23 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep Role as Home Affairs editor for ITN alone is notable, given the number of other articles that exist on people with similar roles; also author (with Helena Kennedy according to Amazon but not BL) of possibly main secondary sorce on very high-profile Sara Thornton case which was used as basis for BBC and C4 documentaries; and prospective MP. Current publicity (and sources) revolves around novel from reputable imprint, but IMHO this is informative BLP and deletion would be a result of recentism (the decade before Wikipedia was founded is a particular blind spot). --Cedderstk 12:33, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
 * KEEP Jenifer Nadel is notable within the Central North constituency of Westminster and I agree her position as Home Affairs editor for ITN is notable. Nastassja 25 February 2015 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nastassjasimensky (talk • contribs) 15:44, 25 February 2015 (UTC) — Nastassjasimensky (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Comment The question is not whether Nadel is notable within the Central North constituency - it's whether she's notable enough to have a Wikipedia article. Wikipedia's basic criteria states "People are presumed notable if they have received significant coverage in multiple published secondary sources which are reliable, intellectually independent of each other, and independent of the subject."  If her role as Home Affairs editor for ITN alone is notable, then providing some independent reliable sources for her ITN work would help a great deal.  The essay Other stuff exists also makes interesting reading.  Good luck!  GoingBatty (talk) 00:41, 26 February 2015 (UTC)
 * delete fails WP:BIO and WP:CREATIVE. LibStar (talk) 13:23, 28 February 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, N ORTH A MERICA 1000 00:11, 1 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep per WP:BASIC - She does appear to have attracted a fair amount of coverage with regard to her first book and her involvement in the Sara Thornton case (I added some refs at the article) and her just published book has also been the subject of coverage. 24.151.10.165 (talk) 00:50, 1 March 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.