Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jennifer Ward


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. Cirt (talk) 18:40, 17 October 2009 (UTC)

Jennifer Ward

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Doesn't satisfy the criteria detailed at WP:CREATIVE (which includes journalists), hasn't been widely cited by peers or successors, no new concepts/techniques/major roles/critical attention or significant contributions. (WP:ENTERTAINER does not apply here, per discussion here.) (n.b. Most of the results talk about Jennifer Ward (author), a completely different person.) ƒ(Δ)² 18:01, 8 October 2009 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Tim Song (talk) 00:05, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Delete: Per WP:BIO and WP:RS. South Bay (talk) 00:07, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions.  -- Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:29, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep as meeting the qualifications of WP:ENTERTAINER which specifically includes "Actors, comedians, opinion makers, models, and television personalities", as was brought up in the above referenced discussion. The guidelines of WP:CREATIVE and WP:ENTERTAINER are not mutually exclusive as both fall under the guiding principles of WP:BIO and WP:GNG. If a journalist is also a television journalist, he becomes a television personality and/or opinion-maker and may be judged by both or either subordinate criteria, or we may simply swim back upstream to BIO or GNG. MichaelQSchmidt (talk)
 * Weak Keep Coverage appears sufficient for local notability: Gnewsing on "jennifer ward" with KYW, or with CFTO . Her hiring was the source of some commentary, her wedding was notable enough to receive local press coverage, and so was her return to a different channel subsequently. After that, she fades from view. There may not be enough to sustain more than a permastub, however, hence the weakness of the keep. Ray  Talk 04:56, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.