Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jennings, Saint Mary


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Courcelles (talk) 14:25, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

Jennings, Saint Mary

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

per WP:GEOLAND  it's all fading away talk 00:43, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions.  it's all fading away talk 00:43, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Caribbean and Antigua and Barbuda. • Gene93k (talk) 01:41, 14 April 2023 (UTC)


 * Huh? Strong keep per WP:GEOLAND. Populated, legally recognized places are typically presumed to be notable, even if their population is very low. Grutness... wha?   03:23, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
 * BTW -if you need to know whether it's a real place, then this might help. Grutness... wha?   03:30, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep: a search for sources indicates that the article passes WP:GEOLAND (populated, legally recognized place) and the sources cited by Grutness also show that this town is real/notable. InterstellarGamer12321 ( talk &#124;  contribs ) 09:55, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep per WP:GEOLAND its a settlement with census data.  Crouch, Swale  ( talk ) 18:28, 17 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep per WP:GEOLAND  // Timothy :: talk  14:19, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep per WP:GEOLAND --  Wesoree  ( T · C ) 14:21, 18 April 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.