Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jenny Canto


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Userfy. Moved to User:Bech86/Jenny Canto by Bech86. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:46, 27 August 2009 (UTC)

Jenny Canto

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

No notability by WP:MUSIC. Sources are a mixture of blogs, stores, user edited and primary sources. No other reliable sources found (language may be an issue). Article creator removed prod calling it "vandalism". Duffbeerforme (talk) 06:06, 21 August 2009 (UTC)

I am also nominating the artist's release:
 * Duffbeerforme (talk) 06:10, 21 August 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep I, the creator of the article, did remove prod and called it vandalism because the sources used for references are reliable, they do establish very clearly the notability of the subject, even though the article is a stub and could use expension. I, and other editors, have been editing and adding more references to this article, and will continue to do so until the discussion is closed. I did call the actions of the user who put the prod "vandalism" because he goes out of his way to "just" nominate articles I've created, or edited, for deletion. His actions seem more like a personal vendetta. The user, Duffbeerforme, makes it very difficult to communicate on his (talk) page. Bech86 (talk) 06:53, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. No coverage in reliable sources. Fails guidelines. Category and song should be deleted too. Bongo  matic  07:40, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Achtung.svg|20px|]] — Duplicate !vote: Bech86 (talk • contribs) has already cast a !vote above.  Keep. Article is a stub and should to be expanded instead of deleted.Bech86 (talk) 07:46, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete I'm very much behind Duffbeerforme on all of his points. But I'll add one more thing: Bech86 is definitely a WP:SPA. He may not be using his account for just this one article, but the other articles he's created - and virtually WP:OWN touches on the idea that his contributions touches WP:POV. Study the history log for this article - leaving out the vandals, Bech86 is really the only editor. If this subject was in fact notable, you would naturally have at least four or five other editors making constructive contributions. But you don't have that here, hence WP:OWN. If this editor has a personal attachment to the subject at-hand, I have problems with that. We're supposed to be creating articles as a way to learn about subjects - and not to write about subjects we might find ourselves as experts, and end up becoming primary sources. Groink (talk) 09:37, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. NN singer. The Weak Willed 12:23, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Insufficient notability. ChildofMidnight (talk) 18:19, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.