Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jenny Hendrix


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. I'm discounting the opinion by Hillary Scott love (and the reference to it by Subtropical-man) because the words "notable, model, music video, mainstream girl" do not amount in any way to an argument that makes sense in the light of the arguments advanced for deletion, i.e., that this fails our inclusion guidelines.  Sandstein  17:44, 1 October 2015 (UTC)

Jenny Hendrix

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails pornbio and gng. 1 scene award and nominations don't count Spartaz Humbug! 21:02, 23 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:57, 23 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:04, 23 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:04, 23 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:04, 23 September 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete as fails PORNBIO & GNG. – Davey 2010 Talk 22:12, 23 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep passes WP:GNG with coverage by firstcoastnews.com and Las Vegas Weekly . Rebecca1990 (talk) 19:51, 24 September 2015 (UTC)
 * I disagree. The first link is local sensationalist nonsense and the second is an interview so primary not secondary. Spartaz Humbug! 21:31, 24 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep notable, model, music video, mainstream girl.--Hillary Scott`love (talk) 12:18, 27 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete. Clear failure to meet PORNBIO. Claims to satisfy the GNG also fail; of the two sources cited, the first is a superficial local news story with little or no content regarding the article subject beyond one neighbor's allegations; the second is a fairly generic promotional interview in a low-circulation giveaway weekly paper. There's just not enough there. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo) (talk) 14:48, 30 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep - per Hillary Scott`love arguments. Subtropical -man   talk   (en-2)   20:54, 30 September 2015 (UTC)
 * LOL I think my HOTTIE !votes weigh more than both yours and her !votes combined!, Good try tho!. – Davey 2010 Talk 22:55, 30 September 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete fails PORNBIO and GNG, no claim of notability in the article, porn career is run-of-the-mill, sources are in-trade or insignificant Kraxler (talk) 01:47, 1 October 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.