Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jenny Lam (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 13:09, 13 September 2020 (UTC)

Jenny Lam
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

WP:BLP of a local school board commissioner, not reliably sourced well enough to be deemed notable for this. School board trustees or commissioners are not a level of office that is considered "inherently" notable under WP:NPOL -- to be considered notable enough for a Wikipedia article, a person at this level of significance has to show credible evidence that she's much more notable than the norm, by virtue of having nationalizing coverage that significantly exceeds just what every school board member can always show in their own local media. But there are just 14 footnotes here, and more than half of them are primary sources (self-published content on the school board's own website) or WordPress blogs that are not support for notability at all -- there are only six cites to real media here, which is not nearly enough coverage to deem her more special than other school board trustees, as literally every school board trustee on earth can show six hits of local media coverage. (Note: first deletion discussion is not relevant at all, as it pertains to a different person who merely happened to have the same name.) Bearcat (talk) 03:01, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 03:01, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 03:01, 6 September 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete per nomination. There's no real evidence of notability. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 03:07, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 03:36, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 03:36, 6 September 2020 (UTC)


 * Comment. FYI, this is the second nomination for an article with this title. The first nomination appears to have been about a different person and the page was deleted. pburka (talk) 03:52, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete Her positions do not give default notability and the coverage is not enough to show notability either.John Pack Lambert (talk) 13:13, 9 September 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.