Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jenny Reeves


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. czar 21:59, 22 December 2019 (UTC)

Jenny Reeves

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The source was an unsuccessful parliamentary candidate and appears to have no other notability. DavidCane (talk) 18:58, 15 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 19:08, 15 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. ~ riley  (  talk  ) 19:42, 15 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. ~ riley  (  talk  ) 19:42, 15 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom I attempted to have this speedy-deleted when it was created, but that was disputed. Jerry (talk) 22:12, 15 December 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete: no sign of notability, only a candidate in the past election, shouldn't have been allowed to stay in the encyclopedia this long. Pam  D  12:53, 16 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete. People do not get Wikipedia articles just for being candidates in elections they did not win — the notability test at WP:NPOL is holding a notable political office, not just running for one. But this does not demonstrate that she has preexisting notability for other reasons that would have gotten her an article independently of the candidacy, and is not referenced to anything even remotely approaching the depth and range and volume of coverage she would have to have to make her candidacy more special than everybody else's candidacies. Bearcat (talk) 14:59, 16 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete people do not become notable merely by running for public office, it is in holding public office they become notable.John Pack Lambert (talk) 18:37, 16 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete Failed candidates do not meet WP:NPOL. Bkissin (talk) 21:57, 16 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete: Non-notable individual. Her only claim to fame is being an unsuccessful parliamentary candidate. Once again, candidates don't get articles for only being candidates. They have to have done something more significant or have won. Lefcentreright  Talk  (plz ping) 09:16, 17 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete Had her vote reduced by 6.5% on 69% turnout, failing to get in. Non-notable.   scope_creep Talk  09:25, 17 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete - run of the mill candidate who lost in a landslide. Bearian (talk) 20:37, 18 December 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.