Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jenova Reunion


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  bibliomaniac 1  5  01:09, 16 April 2020 (UTC)

Jenova Reunion

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article about a band, not making or sourcing any claim to passing WP:MUSIC. As written, this literally just states that the band exists, without even attempting to state anything about them that could even be measured against NMUSIC at all, and it cites no references whatsoever -- literally the only thing here at all is an external link to their profile on a social networking platform, which is not a notability-supporting source. As always, bands are not automatically entitled to have Wikipedia articles just because they exist -- they have to have reliable source coverage in media, verifying one or more accomplishments that would satisfy NMUSIC, for an article to become earned. The article was once a lot longer than this prior to 2012, when the page creator blanked most of their own past work on it -- but simply restoring the old version of the article wouldn't save it, because it was still fundamentally advertorial content still not supported by any reliable sourcing. And for added bonus, the article has literally gone almost completely untouched since then, with just four minor new edits over the next eight years combined, which doesn't speak well of the prospect of salvaging it with new notability claims or sourcing either: if they had accomplished almost anything since 2012 that would have made them appreciably more notable, somebody would already have added it to the article. Bearcat (talk) 21:15, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 21:15, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ireland-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 21:15, 8 April 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom, no RS to be found. Caro7200 (talk) 22:11, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete: Per Nom. Unsourced disguised (embedded) list article. Notability is so lacking that the names of the members were omitted from the article. Otr500 (talk) 19:07, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete. I ran a Google search and could not find a single reliable source about the band.  Versace1608   Wanna Talk? 15:39, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete,Per nom. no reliable source, Alex-h (talk) 18:52, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete per WP:A9. —&#8288; 烏&#8288;Γ (kaw) │ 09:10, 14 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete per above, WP:V. Can't verify them with even a single newspaper review. Bearian (talk) 01:43, 15 April 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.