Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeová Rafá Theological Institute


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Atlantic306 (talk) 23:02, 28 March 2020 (UTC)

Jeová Rafá Theological Institute

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Couldn't obtain much information about this in Google. Fails WP:GNG and seems to be WP:PROMO. Abishe (talk) 09:37, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Abishe (talk) 09:37, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions. Abishe (talk) 09:37, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 11:18, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 11:18, 11 March 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete - Non-notable article that looks like an advertisement. Analog Horror, ( Speak ) 23:44, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep - WP:UNI/AG/WP:UNIGUIDE states the following: "In general, all colleges and universities are de facto notable and should be included on Wikipedia. (That this view has generally prevailed is expressed at WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES.)" Note that none of the identifying criteria of WP:IBA or WP:PROMO are present, so no grounds to dismiss as such? The article appears to be a genuine attempt to identify an institution that is notable as part of a wave of similar organisations, which in turn are part of the Brazilian evangelical boom. Apollinari (talk) 06:23, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep - The article obviously needs improvement, which is not grounds for deletion in itself. At least as notable as the many other minor colleges and university-level institutions with legal status around the world: "Most independently accredited degree-awarding institutions have enough coverage to be notable, although that coverage may not be readily available online." (quoting from WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES) No indications of WP:IBA or WP:PROMO here. Vintage-vintner (talk) 01:25, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep As an independently registered higher education provider, it passes WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES. Cheers, 1292simon (talk) 02:32, 21 March 2020 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, xinbenlv  Talk, Remember to "ping" me 05:29, 21 March 2020 (UTC) self-cross out per BADNAC xinbenlv  Talk,  Remember to "ping" me 00:40, 28 March 2020 (UTC)


 * Keep--tertiary schools are presumed notable.--Epiphyllumlover (talk) 19:45, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep Institutes are notable. Can be improved by adding independent significant coverage.Jai49 (talk) 09:57, 27 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Comment, could you please explain why was this relisted? It looks to me like a pretty clear consensus to keep was already established. Cheers, 1292simon (talk) 00:13, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
 * I withdraw my relist. this was my first batch of attempt to learn closing AfD. I learned that this one is a BADNAC. Since a few additional comment has been made, I will not revert but just a self-cross out. xinbenlv  Talk, Remember to "ping" me 00:40, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Ahh, fair enough. Thanks for the explanation, and for withdrawing the relisting. Cheers, 1292simon (talk) 04:01, 28 March 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.