Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeph Maystruck


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. ✗ plicit  06:53, 15 June 2023 (UTC)

Jeph Maystruck

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

This person does not satisfy the requirements of WP:GNG or WP:SIGCOV. BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 02:56, 8 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators and Canada. Shellwood (talk) 07:49, 8 June 2023 (UTC)


 * @BoyTheKingCanDance The article has been updated to include more references from reputable news sources. It's unfortunate that there aren't even more publications covering Jeph as he is a well known public figure in the Saskatchewan education and marketing sphere. CarterFromSL (talk) 20:17, 8 June 2023 (UTC)


 * Delete. Just social media fluff. Xxanthippe (talk) 05:30, 10 June 2023 (UTC).
 * Delete. Nothing stated in the article is "inherently" notable enough under any of Wikipedia's inclusion criteria, and having a smattering of "local guy does stuff" in the local media of his own hometown is not sufficient to earn him passage on WP:GNG grounds. We're not looking for articles that mention his name, we're looking for articles in which he's the primary subject of the coverage, but there's not nearly enough of the latter being shown at all. Also I'd be remiss if I didn't point out that there's a possible conflict of interest here, as the creator's username includes "FromSL" and the subject works at an organization whose name can be abbreviated as "SL". Bearcat (talk) 01:46, 15 June 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.