Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeqq


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Speedy delete a7, no assertion of notability. NawlinWiki 19:26, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

Jeqq

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Contested speedy; procedural nom. Jeqq does not seem to pass WP:WEB -- delete from me. --Czj 01:43, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete No reason to think this passes WP:WEB. Just being a Digg clone doesn't do anything to impress me either. --Wildnox(talk) 01:53, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete. Sorry, but there is no assertion of notability. There are also no sources, so it fails WP:N and WP:V. I laughed when I noticed that the text was directly copied from Reddit. --N Shar 01:55, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:WEB no notibility shown. Not verifiable outside of itself.--Dacium 02:46, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete as unremarkable webcontent. So tagged. MER-C 02:46, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete as per original nom. Links to similar sites does not notability make. --Ghewgill 02:49, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete search for Jeqq on Google News bring no hits, fails WP:N It may become notable in the future but it is not now. Jeepday 02:51, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, fails WP:WEB, unverifiable. Terence Ong 12:50, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.