Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeremiah David Heaton


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. The delete arguments are far more convincing in this debate. Kevin (talk) 05:27, 28 October 2009 (UTC)

Jeremiah David Heaton

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Not notable enough. Certainly fails WP:POLITICIAN. Rd232 talk 20:27, 20 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 22:03, 20 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Virginia-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 22:05, 20 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Heaton fails WP:POLITICIAN and only RS coverage comes from running for Congress. • Gene93k (talk) 15:08, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 15:39, 21 October 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete - member of board of supervisors is not normally significant enough an office to rate WP:POLITICIAN. Bearian (talk) 23:44, 22 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep . Jeremiah Heaton is a Federal United States Congressional candidate. As a legitimate political figure seeking public office the listing should remain. He represents my Congressional District and I would be willing to bet NONE of the editors on Wikipedia are aware of how well known Mr. Heaton is within the 9th Congressional District of Virginia. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Shawntullis (talk • contribs) 03:11, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep. Wikipedia should be interesting in documenting all information that is legitimate for public consumption. Mr. Heaton is a candidate who is registered with the Federal Election Commission. He is not a teenager running for student council. Mr. Heaton should clearly meet the criteria for legitimacy. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.104.128.37 (talk) 03:17, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment: two IPs, and  removed the nomination and the two delete !votes from the page. It has been reverted. Tim Song (talk) 04:38, 28 October 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.