Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeremiah Frei-Pearson


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  kur  ykh   05:18, 18 May 2010 (UTC)

Jeremiah Frei-Pearson

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Promotional article for a non-notable person who is potentially running for public office. Lincolnite (talk) 09:46, 3 May 2010 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:08, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete as spam, basically. ╟─ Treasury Tag ►  Captain-Regent  ─╢ 09:48, 3 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Strong delete. Not sure if it's spam, but it is certainly non-notable. &mdash; Timneu22 · talk 14:00, 3 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:08, 4 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:08, 4 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Strong keep. He is a candidate for public office compliant with notability guidelines "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject of the article.". —Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.196.0.50 (talk) 04:02, 6 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep. Jeremiah Frei-Pearson has been mentioned in numerous newspaper articles about his work with Children's Rights (a non-profit) as well as his leadership in a class-action lawsuit against Con Edison following a weeks-long blackout in Astoria, Queens, New York. --Joseph123454321 (talk) 06:12, 9 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Delete gets some passing mentions but not sufficient indepth coverage. . LibStar (talk) 02:37, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.