Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeremiah chronicles


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete. —Quarl (talk) 2007-04-13 08:04Z

Jeremiah chronicles

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable fiction series (with only one story, apparently). Google Search only shows Wikipedia and various other non-related Bible websites Lankiveil 03:38, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment The article is in bad shape with almost no references. Could these "Bible websites" provide us with publication history, capable of establishing notability? User:Dimadick
 * Comment, I know that Jeremiah is referenced a bit in the Biblical books entitled "Chronicles", so any search term including the two pops up rather a lot of sites discussing the Bible. Searches for '"Jeremiah Chronicles" "Lo Sobrenatural"' and '"Jeremiah Chronicles" minako' produce nothing of import, unlike what might be expected if this serial were notable.  Lankiveil 04:59, 8 April 2007 (UTC).
 * Delete actually, I believe this could even be speedy deleted both as spam and as non-notable web content. Pascal.Tesson 14:46, 8 April 2007 (UTC)


 * Do Not Deletebro let it go''' My objective in creating the article was the same for creating the story. It is important for the secular world to see the lives of Christians and how they deal with life/ how they became Christians. The stories I write may not be well renowned or popular, but they are truth filled examples of life, which to me makes them notable.  What sort of references are needed besides to Lo Sobrenatural (the story itself)?  I suppose references to the Bible?  Like many other articles in wikipedia, Jeremiah Chronicles is for explanation of a work to be read for enjoyment.  There is no history behind it (because it is a work in progress still undiscovered by many.) Deletion of the article would only free up webspace for other junk that is less notable/ revelvant to today. Creative creation323 03:07, 13 April 2007 (UTC)creative_creation323


 * Do Not Delete This is a well written article with links to the story. Afallingsparrow 07:13, 13 April 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.