Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeremy Gloff (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Relisted a third time without needing to, no further input since then (non-admin closure) Rubbish computer (Talk: Contribs) 08:48, 3 May 2019 (UTC)

Jeremy Gloff
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Seems like clear violation of WP:N and WP:RS. Many of the links are dead or very outdated. None demonstrate particular notability. Already AFD'ed once with no objection. Wknight94 talk 18:52, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Ceethekreator (talk) 19:26, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Ceethekreator (talk) 19:26, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Ceethekreator (talk) 19:26, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:32, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:33, 11 April 2019 (UTC)

Comment The references provided with this 10 year old article are definitely a problem. But deep googling his name reveals--in addition to lots of small time, insignificant coverage and self-downloads-- at least some RS indication of long-term recognition in both his home town and the larger gay community. (An independent documentary on his career has been produced, but I can't determine if it's significant or little more than a You Tube post. Strange.) His website additionally chronicles press recognition that doesn't turn up by googling. Much of it is junk, but perhaps enough of them are good enough to merit notability. I'm not familiar enough with gay press/RS's to weigh in fairly, but I think some digging is required to give this AfD a fair hearing. ShelbyMarion (talk) 20:55, 11 April 2019 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Comment. Dead links aren't in themselves a reason to delete. In this case, after the article was nominated for deletion, was able to use InternetArchiveBot to rescue 13 references, and  used https://tools.wmflabs.org/refill/ to format some references. The article now looks a lot more referenced. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 22:36, 11 April 2019 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 01:05, 18 April 2019 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete - totally unknown nationally, rarely if ever tours, thus fails notability as a performing artist. FWIW, I am a gay man and support gay musicians and performers. Bearian (talk) 20:37, 23 April 2019 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kpg  jhp  jm  02:20, 25 April 2019 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Rubbish computer (Talk: Contribs) 08:56, 2 May 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.