Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeremy Hammond

 This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. humblefool&reg;Deletion Reform 01:43, 3 August 2005 (UTC)

Jeremy Hammond
Vanity (I think). If not deletion then serious cleanup is required. Paddy whack 11:51, July 18, 2005 (UTC)


 * Not vanity. I'm not Jeremy Hammond.   If you wish to suggest some of the steps to clean it up, I'd be more than willing to listen, and can probably oblige.  Chi2600Admin
 * There are a couple things to do to make this an OK contribution. First, you have to explain why this guy is notable (see Notability). He's just a criminal, albeit a politically-motivated one--what has he done to get into an encyclopedia? Secondly, you have to write as if you're a third party--for example, phrases like "our entire mail server" have to go. Also, remember to follow Wikipedia's neutrality policy. Best, Meelar (talk) 15:20, July 18, 2005 (UTC)
 * DOH! Thanks for the heads-up.  Some of the stuff is chopped straight out from news on the issues.  I thought I'd purged the first-person stuff.  Will begin reworking this entry.Chi2600Admin
 * Delete - no evidence that he's anything other than one of myriad small-time criminals. CDC   (talk)  22:47, 18 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per CDC. Pavel Vozenilek 23:34, 18 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Much of the content is what he "would have done." As his own defense was "I didn't do anything really bad" he isn't that notable. --Icelight 23:07, July 20, 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.