Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeremy Keenan


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) BusterD (talk) 11:11, 23 April 2012 (UTC)

Jeremy Keenan

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

No indication this individual meets the requirements of WP:PROF. Jayjg (talk) 00:45, 16 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep. Frequently mentioned by major news organizations in coverage of Sahara conflicts, fulfilling criterion #7 of WP:PROF. (,, , , , and many more per Google News search). The London Times and TIME have both given non-trivial coverage to his research, probably getting him past the WP:GNG as well.  Khazar2 (talk) 01:29, 16 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep Also notable per WP:AUTHOR due to reviews of Sahara Man. --Colapeninsula (talk) 09:44, 16 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 15:47, 16 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 15:48, 16 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 15:48, 16 April 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep: Notable as per above. SL93 (talk) 21:13, 16 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep. Seems to be notable in North African studies. Xxanthippe (talk) 09:09, 17 April 2012 (UTC).
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.