Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeremy Konner


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 16:18, 27 October 2017 (UTC)

Jeremy Konner

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No indication of notability, no significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject. Of the given references, #2, IMDb, is not a reliable source and should be removed. #3, Twitter, is even worse. #1 is used in a highly misleading way because the one Emmy that Drunk History won had nothing to do with Konner's work - in all categories for which it was nominated where Konner himself is mentioned, it did not win. It's also not a secondary source but the Emmy website reporting on the Emmy. #4 is not independent coverage but a press release from his alma mater. #5 and #9 are interviews, Konner talking about himself, not independent coverage. #7 is IMDb again. That leaves the article with two reliable third-party sources, #6 and #8. Neither of those has more than a single sentence of content on Konner, basically just name-drops. Huon (talk) 19:34, 5 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  M assiveYR   ♠  20:22, 5 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions.  M assiveYR   ♠  20:22, 5 October 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 10:12, 12 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete total lack of reliable indepth coverage as shown by the nominator.John Pack Lambert (talk) 04:34, 16 October 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep - This person is attached to numerous projects with other celebrities of note, he consistently works as a creator and director to numerous popular television programs, and he has been profiled on numerous websites. The noteworthy aspect of this person likely appeared limited because the original post used unapproved sources.  However, the poor sources have been removed and appropriate and approved sources have been added.  This allows readers to recognize that this is a person of note.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Munchkin1616 (talk • contribs) 01:02, 17 October 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  J 947 ( c ) (m)   03:25, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete -- the subject is not yet notable; his achievements are not yet signficicant. WP:TOOSOON -- just run-of-the-mill producer / filmmaker. K.e.coffman (talk) 03:10, 24 October 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.