Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeremy Ladell Murph


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy deleted (by Smalljim). Peridon (talk) 12:01, 8 May 2012 (UTC)

Jeremy Ladell Murph

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Fails WP:AUTHOR and WP:ACTOR. No significant independent coverage of the person or his "books." (In fact, I cannot find any coverage of his books.) Has a YouTube channel and that's about it. Article is also written in an annoying style that capitalizes the first letter of every word (which happens to be the writing style of the person himself: see here). A massive violation of MOS. Michitaro (talk) 00:50, 8 May 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete Boy, that has to be the worst writing style I've seen in awhile.  The "books" are web based on his Facebook and MySpace pages.  His "acting" is YouTube videos. Nothing notable. Bgwhite (talk) 06:52, 8 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete It's A Pity We Haven't Banned This Style Of Writing From Wikipedia Yet. (It does appear to be fashionable in writing about the world of hiphop and/or rap. I'm not sure why.) As to the subject, most of the 'books' seem to be fan fiction. One sentence in the article reminds me of Ernie Wise and his 'plays' - "The Book Was Said To Have Been One Of The Best Books Ladell Would Have Ever Wrote". I'm not suggesting that he should stop writing - but I would suggest adopting a more mainstream approach and the creation or original characters and situations, and spending a bit of time working on English grammar. A typescript that is clear to read and grammatically correct avoids instant rejection, and publication by regular publishers is the way to notability, and more importantly, sales. I wish him luck - but to make a career, more than Facebook and YouTube is needed (Smosh being an exception, of course). For Wikipedia, too soon. Peridon (talk) 11:42, 8 May 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.